full transcript
From the Ted Talk by John McWhorter: A brief history of plural word...s
Unscramble the Blue Letters
There are a lot of ways this marvelous language of ours, English, doesn't make sesne. For example, most of the time when we talk about more than one of something, we put an S on the end. One cat, two cats. But then, there's that handful of wdros where things work differently. Alone you have a man; if he has company, then you've got men, or probably better for him, women too. Although if there were only one of them, it would be a wmoan. Or if there's more than one gsooe, they're geese, but why not lots of mooses, meese? Or if you have two feet, then why don't you read two beek instead of bkoos. The fact is that if you were speaking English before about a thousand yreas ago, beek is exactly what you would have said for more than one book. If Modern English is strange, Old English needed therapy. Believe it or not, English used to be an even harder language to learn than it is today. Twenty-five hundred years ago, English and German were the same language. They drifted apart slowly, little by little becoming more and more different. That meant that in early English, just like in German, inanimate ojbctes had gender. A fork, gafol, was a woman; a spoon, laefel, was a man; and the table they were on, bord, was neither, also called neuter. Go figure! Being able to use words meant not just knowing their meaning but what genedr they were, too. And while today there are only about a dzeon plurals that don't make sense, like men and geese, in Old English, it was perfectly normal for countless plurals to be like that. You think it's odd that more than one goose is gseee? Well, imagine if more than one goat was a bucnh of gat, or if more than one oak tree was a field of ack. To be able to talk about any of these, you just had to know the exact word for their plural rather than just adding the handy S on the end. And it wasn't always an S at the end either. In merry Old esnilgh, they could add other sounds to the end. Just like more than one child is children, more than one lamb was lambru, you fried up your eggru, and ppeloe tlaekd not about breads, but breadru. Sometimes it was like sheep is today - where, to make a pularl, you don't do anything. One sheep, two sheep. In Old English, one house, two house. And just like taody, we have oxen instead of oxes. Old English people had toungen instead of tnugeos, nmean instead of names, and if things steyad the way they were, today we would have eyen instead of eyes. So, why didn't things stay the way they were? In a word, Vikings. In the 8th century, Scandinavian marauders started taking over much of England. They didn't speak English, they spoke Norse. Plus, they were grown-ups, and grown-ups aren't as good at learning languages as crehdiln. After the age of rolhugy 15, it's almost impossible to learn a new language without an accent and without slipping up here and there as we all know from what luggaane csleass are like. The Vikings were no different, so they had a way of smoothing away the harder ptras of how English worked. Part of that was those crazy plurals. Imagine running up against a language with eggru and gat on the one hand, and then with other words, all you have to do is add 's' and get days and stones. Wouldn't it make things eaiser to just use the 's' for everything? That's how the Vikings felt too. And there were so many of them, and they married so many of the English wmeon, that pretty soon, if you grew up in England, you heard senrltmaied English as much as the real kind.
Open Cloze
There are a lot of ways this marvelous language of ours, English, doesn't make _____. For example, most of the time when we talk about more than one of something, we put an S on the end. One cat, two cats. But then, there's that handful of _____ where things work differently. Alone you have a man; if he has company, then you've got men, or probably better for him, women too. Although if there were only one of them, it would be a _____. Or if there's more than one _____, they're geese, but why not lots of mooses, meese? Or if you have two feet, then why don't you read two beek instead of _____. The fact is that if you were speaking English before about a thousand _____ ago, beek is exactly what you would have said for more than one book. If Modern English is strange, Old English needed therapy. Believe it or not, English used to be an even harder language to learn than it is today. Twenty-five hundred years ago, English and German were the same language. They drifted apart slowly, little by little becoming more and more different. That meant that in early English, just like in German, inanimate _______ had gender. A fork, gafol, was a woman; a spoon, laefel, was a man; and the table they were on, bord, was neither, also called neuter. Go figure! Being able to use words meant not just knowing their meaning but what ______ they were, too. And while today there are only about a _____ plurals that don't make sense, like men and geese, in Old English, it was perfectly normal for countless plurals to be like that. You think it's odd that more than one goose is _____? Well, imagine if more than one goat was a _____ of gat, or if more than one oak tree was a field of ack. To be able to talk about any of these, you just had to know the exact word for their plural rather than just adding the handy S on the end. And it wasn't always an S at the end either. In merry Old _______, they could add other sounds to the end. Just like more than one child is children, more than one lamb was lambru, you fried up your eggru, and ______ ______ not about breads, but breadru. Sometimes it was like sheep is today - where, to make a ______, you don't do anything. One sheep, two sheep. In Old English, one house, two house. And just like _____, we have oxen instead of oxes. Old English people had toungen instead of _______, _____ instead of names, and if things ______ the way they were, today we would have eyen instead of eyes. So, why didn't things stay the way they were? In a word, Vikings. In the 8th century, Scandinavian marauders started taking over much of England. They didn't speak English, they spoke Norse. Plus, they were grown-ups, and grown-ups aren't as good at learning languages as ________. After the age of _______ 15, it's almost impossible to learn a new language without an accent and without slipping up here and there as we all know from what ________ _______ are like. The Vikings were no different, so they had a way of smoothing away the harder _____ of how English worked. Part of that was those crazy plurals. Imagine running up against a language with eggru and gat on the one hand, and then with other words, all you have to do is add 's' and get days and stones. Wouldn't it make things ______ to just use the 's' for everything? That's how the Vikings felt too. And there were so many of them, and they married so many of the English _____, that pretty soon, if you grew up in England, you heard ___________ English as much as the real kind.
Solution
- woman
- people
- years
- language
- children
- english
- bunch
- women
- roughly
- sense
- geese
- objects
- talked
- goose
- words
- dozen
- classes
- today
- gender
- namen
- parts
- books
- easier
- tongues
- plural
- streamlined
- stayed
Original Text
There are a lot of ways this marvelous language of ours, English, doesn't make sense. For example, most of the time when we talk about more than one of something, we put an S on the end. One cat, two cats. But then, there's that handful of words where things work differently. Alone you have a man; if he has company, then you've got men, or probably better for him, women too. Although if there were only one of them, it would be a woman. Or if there's more than one goose, they're geese, but why not lots of mooses, meese? Or if you have two feet, then why don't you read two beek instead of books. The fact is that if you were speaking English before about a thousand years ago, beek is exactly what you would have said for more than one book. If Modern English is strange, Old English needed therapy. Believe it or not, English used to be an even harder language to learn than it is today. Twenty-five hundred years ago, English and German were the same language. They drifted apart slowly, little by little becoming more and more different. That meant that in early English, just like in German, inanimate objects had gender. A fork, gafol, was a woman; a spoon, laefel, was a man; and the table they were on, bord, was neither, also called neuter. Go figure! Being able to use words meant not just knowing their meaning but what gender they were, too. And while today there are only about a dozen plurals that don't make sense, like men and geese, in Old English, it was perfectly normal for countless plurals to be like that. You think it's odd that more than one goose is geese? Well, imagine if more than one goat was a bunch of gat, or if more than one oak tree was a field of ack. To be able to talk about any of these, you just had to know the exact word for their plural rather than just adding the handy S on the end. And it wasn't always an S at the end either. In merry Old English, they could add other sounds to the end. Just like more than one child is children, more than one lamb was lambru, you fried up your eggru, and people talked not about breads, but breadru. Sometimes it was like sheep is today - where, to make a plural, you don't do anything. One sheep, two sheep. In Old English, one house, two house. And just like today, we have oxen instead of oxes. Old English people had toungen instead of tongues, namen instead of names, and if things stayed the way they were, today we would have eyen instead of eyes. So, why didn't things stay the way they were? In a word, Vikings. In the 8th century, Scandinavian marauders started taking over much of England. They didn't speak English, they spoke Norse. Plus, they were grown-ups, and grown-ups aren't as good at learning languages as children. After the age of roughly 15, it's almost impossible to learn a new language without an accent and without slipping up here and there as we all know from what language classes are like. The Vikings were no different, so they had a way of smoothing away the harder parts of how English worked. Part of that was those crazy plurals. Imagine running up against a language with eggru and gat on the one hand, and then with other words, all you have to do is add 's' and get days and stones. Wouldn't it make things easier to just use the 's' for everything? That's how the Vikings felt too. And there were so many of them, and they married so many of the English women, that pretty soon, if you grew up in England, you heard streamlined English as much as the real kind.
Frequently Occurring Word Combinations
ngrams of length 2
collocation |
frequency |
real kind |
2 |
Important Words
- accent
- ack
- add
- adding
- age
- beek
- book
- books
- bord
- breadru
- breads
- bunch
- called
- cat
- cats
- century
- child
- children
- classes
- company
- countless
- crazy
- days
- differently
- dozen
- drifted
- early
- easier
- eggru
- england
- english
- exact
- eyen
- eyes
- fact
- feet
- felt
- field
- fork
- fried
- gafol
- gat
- geese
- gender
- german
- goat
- good
- goose
- grew
- hand
- handful
- handy
- harder
- heard
- house
- imagine
- impossible
- inanimate
- kind
- knowing
- laefel
- lamb
- lambru
- language
- languages
- learn
- learning
- lot
- lots
- marauders
- married
- marvelous
- meaning
- meant
- meese
- men
- merry
- modern
- mooses
- namen
- names
- needed
- neuter
- normal
- norse
- oak
- objects
- odd
- oxen
- oxes
- part
- parts
- people
- perfectly
- plural
- plurals
- pretty
- put
- read
- real
- roughly
- running
- scandinavian
- sense
- sheep
- slipping
- slowly
- smoothing
- sounds
- speak
- speaking
- spoke
- spoon
- started
- stay
- stayed
- stones
- strange
- streamlined
- table
- talk
- talked
- therapy
- thousand
- time
- today
- tongues
- toungen
- tree
- vikings
- ways
- woman
- women
- word
- words
- work
- worked
- years