full transcript
From the Ted Talk by Zohreh Davoudi: Are we living in a simulation?
Unscramble the Blue Letters
Another possible place to look comes from the concept that finite computing power, no matter how huge, can’t simulate infinities. If space and time are continuous, then even a tiny piece of the universe has infinite points and becomes impossible to simulate with finite computing power. So a simulation would have to rreeespnt space and time in very small picees. These would be almost incomprehensibly tiny. But we might be able to scerah for them by using certain sbatoiumc particles as probes. The basic principle is this: the smaller something is, the more snsiiteve it will be to disruption— think of hitting a pothole on a skateboard versus in a truck. Any unit in space-time would be so small that most things would travel through it without disruption— not just objects large enough to be vislbie to the naked eye, but also molecules, atoms, and even electrons and most of the other subatomic priclaets we’ve desivcerod.
Open Cloze
Another possible place to look comes from the concept that finite computing power, no matter how huge, can’t simulate infinities. If space and time are continuous, then even a tiny piece of the universe has infinite points and becomes impossible to simulate with finite computing power. So a simulation would have to _________ space and time in very small ______. These would be almost incomprehensibly tiny. But we might be able to ______ for them by using certain _________ particles as probes. The basic principle is this: the smaller something is, the more _________ it will be to disruption— think of hitting a pothole on a skateboard versus in a truck. Any unit in space-time would be so small that most things would travel through it without disruption— not just objects large enough to be _______ to the naked eye, but also molecules, atoms, and even electrons and most of the other subatomic _________ we’ve __________.
Solution
- subatomic
- search
- discovered
- represent
- visible
- pieces
- sensitive
- particles
Original Text
Another possible place to look comes from the concept that finite computing power, no matter how huge, can’t simulate infinities. If space and time are continuous, then even a tiny piece of the universe has infinite points and becomes impossible to simulate with finite computing power. So a simulation would have to represent space and time in very small pieces. These would be almost incomprehensibly tiny. But we might be able to search for them by using certain subatomic particles as probes. The basic principle is this: the smaller something is, the more sensitive it will be to disruption— think of hitting a pothole on a skateboard versus in a truck. Any unit in space-time would be so small that most things would travel through it without disruption— not just objects large enough to be visible to the naked eye, but also molecules, atoms, and even electrons and most of the other subatomic particles we’ve discovered.
Frequently Occurring Word Combinations
ngrams of length 2
collocation |
frequency |
life forms |
2 |
finite computing |
2 |
planck scale |
2 |
Important Words
- atoms
- basic
- computing
- concept
- continuous
- discovered
- electrons
- eye
- finite
- hitting
- huge
- impossible
- incomprehensibly
- infinite
- infinities
- large
- matter
- molecules
- naked
- objects
- particles
- piece
- pieces
- place
- points
- pothole
- power
- principle
- probes
- represent
- search
- sensitive
- simulate
- simulation
- skateboard
- small
- smaller
- space
- subatomic
- time
- tiny
- travel
- truck
- unit
- universe
- visible