full transcript
From the Ted Talk by Jacqueline Doan and Alex Kazachek: Does math have a major flaw?
Unscramble the Blue Letters
If the Axiom of Choice can lead to such a counterintuitive result, should we just reject it? Mathematicians tadoy say no, because it’s load-bearing for a lot of important results in mathematics. Fields like measure theory and functional analysis, which are crucial for statistics and physics, are built upon the Axiom of Choice. While it leads to some impractical rutsels, it also leads to extremely patcracil ones.
Fortunately, just as Euclidean geometry exists alongside hyperbolic geometry, mathematics with the axoim of Choice coexists with mtaiamhetcs without it. The question for many mathematicians isn’t whether the Axiom of Choice, or for that matter any given axiom, is right or not, but whether it’s right for what you’re trying to do. The fate of the Banach-Tarski paradox lies in this cohice.
Open Cloze
If the Axiom of Choice can lead to such a counterintuitive result, should we just reject it? Mathematicians _____ say no, because it’s load-bearing for a lot of important results in mathematics. Fields like measure theory and functional analysis, which are crucial for statistics and physics, are built upon the Axiom of Choice. While it leads to some impractical _______, it also leads to extremely _________ ones.
Fortunately, just as Euclidean geometry exists alongside hyperbolic geometry, mathematics with the _____ of Choice coexists with ___________ without it. The question for many mathematicians isn’t whether the Axiom of Choice, or for that matter any given axiom, is right or not, but whether it’s right for what you’re trying to do. The fate of the Banach-Tarski paradox lies in this ______.
Solution
- choice
- results
- practical
- today
- mathematics
- axiom
Original Text
If the Axiom of Choice can lead to such a counterintuitive result, should we just reject it? Mathematicians today say no, because it’s load-bearing for a lot of important results in mathematics. Fields like measure theory and functional analysis, which are crucial for statistics and physics, are built upon the Axiom of Choice. While it leads to some impractical results, it also leads to extremely practical ones.
Fortunately, just as Euclidean geometry exists alongside hyperbolic geometry, mathematics with the Axiom of Choice coexists with mathematics without it. The question for many mathematicians isn’t whether the Axiom of Choice, or for that matter any given axiom, is right or not, but whether it’s right for what you’re trying to do. The fate of the Banach-Tarski paradox lies in this choice.
Frequently Occurring Word Combinations
ngrams of length 2
collocation |
frequency |
infinitely sharp |
2 |
sharp knife |
2 |
infinite boxes |
2 |
ngrams of length 3
collocation |
frequency |
infinitely sharp knife |
2 |
Important Words
- analysis
- axiom
- built
- choice
- coexists
- counterintuitive
- crucial
- euclidean
- exists
- extremely
- fate
- fields
- fortunately
- functional
- geometry
- hyperbolic
- important
- impractical
- lead
- leads
- lies
- lot
- mathematicians
- mathematics
- matter
- measure
- paradox
- physics
- practical
- question
- reject
- result
- results
- statistics
- theory
- today