full transcript
From the Ted Talk by Gavin Schmidt: The emergent patterns of climate change
Unscramble the Blue Letters
The different scales that give you these kinds of ptaetrns range over an enormous range of mutidgane, roughly 14 orders of magnitude, from the small microscopic partleics that seed cduols to the size of the planet itself, from 10 to the minus six to 10 to the eight, 14 orders of spatial magnitude. In time, from milliseconds to millennia, again around 14 orders of magnitude.
What does that mean? Okay, well if you think about how you can calculate these things, you can take what you can see, okay, I'm going to chop it up into lots of little boexs, and that's the result of physics, right? And if I think about a weather moedl, that spnas about five orders of magnitude, from the palnet to a few kilometers, and the time scale from a few minutes to 10 days, maybe a month. We're interested in more than that. We're interested in the climate. That's years, that's millennia, and we need to go to even smaller scales. The stuff that we can't resolve, the sub-scale processes, we need to approximate in some way. That is a huge challenge. Climate models in the 1990s took an even smlaler chunk of that, only about three oedrrs of magnitude. Climate models in the 2010s, kind of what we're working with now, four orders of magnitude. We have 14 to go, and we're increasing our capability of sailmntuig those at about one extra order of magnitude every decade. One extra order of magnitude in spcae is 10,000 temis more calculations. And we keep adding more things, more questions to these different models.
Open Cloze
The different scales that give you these kinds of ________ range over an enormous range of _________, roughly 14 orders of magnitude, from the small microscopic _________ that seed ______ to the size of the planet itself, from 10 to the minus six to 10 to the eight, 14 orders of spatial magnitude. In time, from milliseconds to millennia, again around 14 orders of magnitude.
What does that mean? Okay, well if you think about how you can calculate these things, you can take what you can see, okay, I'm going to chop it up into lots of little _____, and that's the result of physics, right? And if I think about a weather _____, that _____ about five orders of magnitude, from the ______ to a few kilometers, and the time scale from a few minutes to 10 days, maybe a month. We're interested in more than that. We're interested in the climate. That's years, that's millennia, and we need to go to even smaller scales. The stuff that we can't resolve, the sub-scale processes, we need to approximate in some way. That is a huge challenge. Climate models in the 1990s took an even _______ chunk of that, only about three ______ of magnitude. Climate models in the 2010s, kind of what we're working with now, four orders of magnitude. We have 14 to go, and we're increasing our capability of __________ those at about one extra order of magnitude every decade. One extra order of magnitude in _____ is 10,000 _____ more calculations. And we keep adding more things, more questions to these different models.
Solution
- smaller
- particles
- patterns
- space
- clouds
- magnitude
- orders
- boxes
- times
- planet
- model
- spans
- simulating
Original Text
The different scales that give you these kinds of patterns range over an enormous range of magnitude, roughly 14 orders of magnitude, from the small microscopic particles that seed clouds to the size of the planet itself, from 10 to the minus six to 10 to the eight, 14 orders of spatial magnitude. In time, from milliseconds to millennia, again around 14 orders of magnitude.
What does that mean? Okay, well if you think about how you can calculate these things, you can take what you can see, okay, I'm going to chop it up into lots of little boxes, and that's the result of physics, right? And if I think about a weather model, that spans about five orders of magnitude, from the planet to a few kilometers, and the time scale from a few minutes to 10 days, maybe a month. We're interested in more than that. We're interested in the climate. That's years, that's millennia, and we need to go to even smaller scales. The stuff that we can't resolve, the sub-scale processes, we need to approximate in some way. That is a huge challenge. Climate models in the 1990s took an even smaller chunk of that, only about three orders of magnitude. Climate models in the 2010s, kind of what we're working with now, four orders of magnitude. We have 14 to go, and we're increasing our capability of simulating those at about one extra order of magnitude every decade. One extra order of magnitude in space is 10,000 times more calculations. And we keep adding more things, more questions to these different models.
Frequently Occurring Word Combinations
ngrams of length 2
collocation |
frequency |
emergent properties |
3 |
good match |
3 |
huge challenge |
2 |
climate models |
2 |
extra order |
2 |
tropical cyclones |
2 |
ozone hole |
2 |
air pollution |
2 |
carbon dioxide |
2 |
Important Words
- adding
- approximate
- boxes
- calculate
- calculations
- capability
- challenge
- chop
- chunk
- climate
- clouds
- days
- decade
- enormous
- extra
- give
- huge
- increasing
- interested
- kilometers
- kind
- kinds
- lots
- magnitude
- microscopic
- millennia
- milliseconds
- minutes
- model
- models
- month
- order
- orders
- particles
- patterns
- physics
- planet
- processes
- questions
- range
- resolve
- result
- roughly
- scale
- scales
- seed
- simulating
- size
- small
- smaller
- space
- spans
- spatial
- stuff
- time
- times
- weather
- working
- years