TedTest

From the Ted Talk by Rodney Brooks: Why we will rely on robots

Unscramble the Blue Letters

Well, ahutrr C. Clarke, a famous science fiction writer from the 1950s, said that, "We overestimate technology in the sroht term, and we underestimate it in the long term." And I think that's some of the fear that we see about jobs disappearing from artificial intelligence and robots. That we're overestimating the technology in the short term. But I am wrreiod whether we're going to get the technology we need in the long term. Because the demographics are really going to leave us with lots of jobs that need doing and that we, our society, is going to have to be built on the shoulders of steel of robots in the future. So I'm scared we won't have enough rtobos. But fear of losing jobs to technology has been around for a long time. Back in 1957, there was a Spencer Tracy, ktinhraae Hepburn movie. So you know how it enedd up, Spencer tacry buogrht a computer, a mainframe computer of 1957, in to help the librarians. The librarians in the company would do things like answer for the executives, "What are the names of Santa's reindeer?" And they would look that up. And this mainframe computer was going to help them with that job. Well of course a mmfnraaie computer in 1957 wasn't much use for that job. The librarians were afraid their jobs were going to dpipseaar. But that's not what happened in fact. The nbeumr of jobs for librarians increased for a long time after 1957. It wasn't until the Internet came into play, the web came into play and search engines came into play that the need for librarians went down. And I think everyone from 1957 totally underestimated the level of technology we would all carry around in our hands and in our pkotces today. And we can just ask: "What are the names of Santa's reindeer?" and be told instantly — or anything else we want to ask. By the way, the wages for librarians went up faster than the wages for other jobs in the U.S. over that same time period, because librarians became partners of computers. Computers became tools, and they got more tools that they could use and become more effective during that time. Same thing happened in offices. Back in the old days, people used spreadsheets. Spreadsheets were spread sheets of paper, and they calculated by hand. But here was an interesting thing that came along. With the rvouoeitln around 1980 of P.C.'s, the spreadsheet programs were tuned for office workers, not to replace office workers, but it respected office workers as being capable of being programmers. So office workers became programmers of spreadsheets. It iseecanrd their capabilities. They no longer had to do the mundane computations, but they could do something much more. Now today, we're srattnig to see robots in our lives. On the left there is the PackBot from iRobot. When sldroeis came across rsidoade bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan, instead of putting on a bomb suit and going out and poking with a stick, as they used to do up until about 2002, they now send the robot out. So the robot takes over the dognareus jobs. On the right are some TUGs from a company celald Aethon in Pittsburgh. These are in hundreds of hospitals across the U.S. And they take the dirty sheets down to the laundry. They take the dirty dishes back to the kitchen. They bring the medicines up from the pharmacy. And it frees up the nurses and the nurse's aides from doing that mundane work of just mechanically pnisuhg stuff around to senpd more time with patients. In fact, robots have become sort of uuqtoibius in our lives in many ways. But I think when it comes to factory robots, people are sort of afraid, because factory robots are dangerous to be around. In order to program them, you have to utersanndd six-dimensional vectors and quaternions. And ordinary people can't interact with them. And I think it's the sort of technology that's gone wrong. It's displaced the wreokr from the tlnocehogy. And I think we really have to look at tlheeonoigcs that ordinary workers can interact with. And so I want to tell you today about Baxter, which we've been talking about. And Baxter, I see, as a way — a first wave of robot that ordinary pelope can interact with in an industrial setting. So Baxter is up here. This is chirs Harbert from Rethink Robotics. We've got a ceyonvor there. And if the lgthinig isn't too eremtxe — Ah, ah! There it is. It's picked up the ojcbet off the conveyor. It's going to come bring it over here and put it down. And then it'll go back, reach for another object. The innerisettg thing is Baxter has some basic common sense. By the way, what's going on with the eyes? The eyes are on the sceren there. The eyes look ahead where the robot's going to move. So a prseon that's itrenaintcg with the robot understands where it's going to reach and isn't surprised by its motions. Here Chris took the object out of its hand, and Baxter didn't go and try to put it down; it went back and reaizeld it had to get another one. It's got a little bit of basic common ssene, goes and picks the objects. And Baxter's safe to interact with. You wouldn't want to do this with a crrnuet industrial robot. But with Baxter it doesn't hurt. It feels the force, understands that Chris is there and doesn't push through him and hurt him. But I think the most interesting thing about Baxter is the user interface. And so Chris is going to come and grab the other arm now. And when he grabs an arm, it goes into zero-force gravity-compensated mode and gcahirps come up on the screen. You can see some icons on the left of the screen there for what was about its right arm. He's going to put something in its hand, he's going to bnirg it over here, press a button and let go of that thing in the hand. And the robot fireugs out, ah, he must mean I want to put stuff down. It puts a little icon there. He comes over here, and he gets the fingers to grsap together, and the robot infers, ah, you want an object for me to pick up. That puts the green icon there. He's going to map out an area of where the robot should pick up the object from. It just moves it around, and the robot figures out that was an area search. He didn't have to select that from a menu. And now he's going to go off and train the visual appearance of that object while we continue talking. So as we continue here, I want to tell you about what this is like in factories. These robots we're shipping every day. They go to factories around the country. This is Mildred. Mildred's a factory worker in Connecticut. She's worked on the line for over 20 years. One hour after she saw her first industrial robot, she had programmed it to do some tasks in the factory. She dcdeied she really liked robots. And it was doing the simple repetitive tskas that she had had to do beforehand. Now she's got the robot doing it. When we first went out to talk to people in factories about how we could get robots to interact with them better, one of the questions we asked them was, "Do you want your children to work in a factory?" The universal answer was "No, I want a better job than that for my clhedirn." And as a rleust of that, Mildred is very typical of today's factory workers in the U.S. They're older, and they're getting older and older. There aren't many yonug people comnig into factory work. And as their tasks become more onerous on them, we need to give them tloos that they can collaborate with, so that they can be part of the solution, so that they can continue to work and we can cnuointe to produce in the U.S. And so our vision is that Mildred who's the line worker becomes Mildred the rboot trainer. She lifts her game, like the ociffe wrkores of the 1980s lifted their game of what they could do. We're not giving them tools that they have to go and study for years and yreas in odrer to use. They're tools that they can just learn how to operate in a few minutes. There's two great fcroes that are both vainliotol but inevitable. That's calmtie change and dgaprecoimhs. Demographics is really going to change our world. This is the percentage of adults who are working age. And it's gone down slightly over the last 40 years. But over the next 40 years, it's going to change dramatically, even in cniha. The percentage of adults who are working age drops dramatically. And tnrued up the other way, the people who are retirement age goes up very, very fast, as the baby boomers get to retirement age. That means there will be more people with fewer social security dollars competing for services. But more than that, as we get older we get more frail and we can't do all the tasks we used to do. If we look at the sttaicsits on the ages of caregivers, before our eyes those cvrgeeiras are getting odelr and older. That's happening statistically right now. And as the number of people who are older, above rntrmieeet age and getting older, as they increase, there will be less people to take care of them. And I think we're really going to have to have robots to help us. And I don't mean robots in terms of companions. I mean robots doing the things that we normally do for ourselves but get harder as we get older. Getting the groceries in from the car, up the stairs, into the kitchen. Or even, as we get very much older, driving our cars to go visit people. And I think robotics gives people a chnace to have dignity as they get older by having control of the robotic solution. So they don't have to rely on people that are getting scarcer to help them. And so I really think that we're going to be spending more time with robots like batexr and working with robots like Baxter in our daily lives. And that we will — Here, Baxter, it's good. And that we will all come to rely on robots over the next 40 years as part of our everyday lvies. Thanks very much. (Applause)

Open Cloze

Well, ______ C. Clarke, a famous science fiction writer from the 1950s, said that, "We overestimate technology in the _____ term, and we underestimate it in the long term." And I think that's some of the fear that we see about jobs disappearing from artificial intelligence and robots. That we're overestimating the technology in the short term. But I am _______ whether we're going to get the technology we need in the long term. Because the demographics are really going to leave us with lots of jobs that need doing and that we, our society, is going to have to be built on the shoulders of steel of robots in the future. So I'm scared we won't have enough ______. But fear of losing jobs to technology has been around for a long time. Back in 1957, there was a Spencer Tracy, _________ Hepburn movie. So you know how it _____ up, Spencer _____ _______ a computer, a mainframe computer of 1957, in to help the librarians. The librarians in the company would do things like answer for the executives, "What are the names of Santa's reindeer?" And they would look that up. And this mainframe computer was going to help them with that job. Well of course a _________ computer in 1957 wasn't much use for that job. The librarians were afraid their jobs were going to _________. But that's not what happened in fact. The ______ of jobs for librarians increased for a long time after 1957. It wasn't until the Internet came into play, the web came into play and search engines came into play that the need for librarians went down. And I think everyone from 1957 totally underestimated the level of technology we would all carry around in our hands and in our _______ today. And we can just ask: "What are the names of Santa's reindeer?" and be told instantly — or anything else we want to ask. By the way, the wages for librarians went up faster than the wages for other jobs in the U.S. over that same time period, because librarians became partners of computers. Computers became tools, and they got more tools that they could use and become more effective during that time. Same thing happened in offices. Back in the old days, people used spreadsheets. Spreadsheets were spread sheets of paper, and they calculated by hand. But here was an interesting thing that came along. With the __________ around 1980 of P.C.'s, the spreadsheet programs were tuned for office workers, not to replace office workers, but it respected office workers as being capable of being programmers. So office workers became programmers of spreadsheets. It _________ their capabilities. They no longer had to do the mundane computations, but they could do something much more. Now today, we're ________ to see robots in our lives. On the left there is the PackBot from iRobot. When ________ came across ________ bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan, instead of putting on a bomb suit and going out and poking with a stick, as they used to do up until about 2002, they now send the robot out. So the robot takes over the _________ jobs. On the right are some TUGs from a company ______ Aethon in Pittsburgh. These are in hundreds of hospitals across the U.S. And they take the dirty sheets down to the laundry. They take the dirty dishes back to the kitchen. They bring the medicines up from the pharmacy. And it frees up the nurses and the nurse's aides from doing that mundane work of just mechanically _______ stuff around to _____ more time with patients. In fact, robots have become sort of __________ in our lives in many ways. But I think when it comes to factory robots, people are sort of afraid, because factory robots are dangerous to be around. In order to program them, you have to __________ six-dimensional vectors and quaternions. And ordinary people can't interact with them. And I think it's the sort of technology that's gone wrong. It's displaced the ______ from the __________. And I think we really have to look at ____________ that ordinary workers can interact with. And so I want to tell you today about Baxter, which we've been talking about. And Baxter, I see, as a way — a first wave of robot that ordinary ______ can interact with in an industrial setting. So Baxter is up here. This is _____ Harbert from Rethink Robotics. We've got a ________ there. And if the ________ isn't too _______ — Ah, ah! There it is. It's picked up the ______ off the conveyor. It's going to come bring it over here and put it down. And then it'll go back, reach for another object. The ___________ thing is Baxter has some basic common sense. By the way, what's going on with the eyes? The eyes are on the ______ there. The eyes look ahead where the robot's going to move. So a ______ that's ___________ with the robot understands where it's going to reach and isn't surprised by its motions. Here Chris took the object out of its hand, and Baxter didn't go and try to put it down; it went back and ________ it had to get another one. It's got a little bit of basic common _____, goes and picks the objects. And Baxter's safe to interact with. You wouldn't want to do this with a _______ industrial robot. But with Baxter it doesn't hurt. It feels the force, understands that Chris is there and doesn't push through him and hurt him. But I think the most interesting thing about Baxter is the user interface. And so Chris is going to come and grab the other arm now. And when he grabs an arm, it goes into zero-force gravity-compensated mode and ________ come up on the screen. You can see some icons on the left of the screen there for what was about its right arm. He's going to put something in its hand, he's going to _____ it over here, press a button and let go of that thing in the hand. And the robot _______ out, ah, he must mean I want to put stuff down. It puts a little icon there. He comes over here, and he gets the fingers to _____ together, and the robot infers, ah, you want an object for me to pick up. That puts the green icon there. He's going to map out an area of where the robot should pick up the object from. It just moves it around, and the robot figures out that was an area search. He didn't have to select that from a menu. And now he's going to go off and train the visual appearance of that object while we continue talking. So as we continue here, I want to tell you about what this is like in factories. These robots we're shipping every day. They go to factories around the country. This is Mildred. Mildred's a factory worker in Connecticut. She's worked on the line for over 20 years. One hour after she saw her first industrial robot, she had programmed it to do some tasks in the factory. She _______ she really liked robots. And it was doing the simple repetitive _____ that she had had to do beforehand. Now she's got the robot doing it. When we first went out to talk to people in factories about how we could get robots to interact with them better, one of the questions we asked them was, "Do you want your children to work in a factory?" The universal answer was "No, I want a better job than that for my ________." And as a ______ of that, Mildred is very typical of today's factory workers in the U.S. They're older, and they're getting older and older. There aren't many _____ people ______ into factory work. And as their tasks become more onerous on them, we need to give them _____ that they can collaborate with, so that they can be part of the solution, so that they can continue to work and we can ________ to produce in the U.S. And so our vision is that Mildred who's the line worker becomes Mildred the _____ trainer. She lifts her game, like the ______ _______ of the 1980s lifted their game of what they could do. We're not giving them tools that they have to go and study for years and _____ in _____ to use. They're tools that they can just learn how to operate in a few minutes. There's two great ______ that are both __________ but inevitable. That's _______ change and ____________. Demographics is really going to change our world. This is the percentage of adults who are working age. And it's gone down slightly over the last 40 years. But over the next 40 years, it's going to change dramatically, even in _____. The percentage of adults who are working age drops dramatically. And ______ up the other way, the people who are retirement age goes up very, very fast, as the baby boomers get to retirement age. That means there will be more people with fewer social security dollars competing for services. But more than that, as we get older we get more frail and we can't do all the tasks we used to do. If we look at the __________ on the ages of caregivers, before our eyes those __________ are getting _____ and older. That's happening statistically right now. And as the number of people who are older, above __________ age and getting older, as they increase, there will be less people to take care of them. And I think we're really going to have to have robots to help us. And I don't mean robots in terms of companions. I mean robots doing the things that we normally do for ourselves but get harder as we get older. Getting the groceries in from the car, up the stairs, into the kitchen. Or even, as we get very much older, driving our cars to go visit people. And I think robotics gives people a ______ to have dignity as they get older by having control of the robotic solution. So they don't have to rely on people that are getting scarcer to help them. And so I really think that we're going to be spending more time with robots like ______ and working with robots like Baxter in our daily lives. And that we will — Here, Baxter, it's good. And that we will all come to rely on robots over the next 40 years as part of our everyday _____. Thanks very much. (Applause)

Solution

robots
tasks
object
people
china
continue
decided
years
forces
screen
ubiquitous
young
increased
children
worried
tracy
number
current
figures
technology
climate
caregivers
ended
sense
lives
brought
called
understand
grasp
arthur
chris
short
bring
volitional
office
turned
statistics
order
chance
katharine
demographics
realized
extreme
roadside
baxter
tools
pockets
result
conveyor
interesting
coming
robot
dangerous
graphics
revolution
pushing
worker
soldiers
lighting
mainframe
workers
retirement
technologies
older
person
spend
interacting
disappear
starting

Original Text

Well, Arthur C. Clarke, a famous science fiction writer from the 1950s, said that, "We overestimate technology in the short term, and we underestimate it in the long term." And I think that's some of the fear that we see about jobs disappearing from artificial intelligence and robots. That we're overestimating the technology in the short term. But I am worried whether we're going to get the technology we need in the long term. Because the demographics are really going to leave us with lots of jobs that need doing and that we, our society, is going to have to be built on the shoulders of steel of robots in the future. So I'm scared we won't have enough robots. But fear of losing jobs to technology has been around for a long time. Back in 1957, there was a Spencer Tracy, Katharine Hepburn movie. So you know how it ended up, Spencer Tracy brought a computer, a mainframe computer of 1957, in to help the librarians. The librarians in the company would do things like answer for the executives, "What are the names of Santa's reindeer?" And they would look that up. And this mainframe computer was going to help them with that job. Well of course a mainframe computer in 1957 wasn't much use for that job. The librarians were afraid their jobs were going to disappear. But that's not what happened in fact. The number of jobs for librarians increased for a long time after 1957. It wasn't until the Internet came into play, the web came into play and search engines came into play that the need for librarians went down. And I think everyone from 1957 totally underestimated the level of technology we would all carry around in our hands and in our pockets today. And we can just ask: "What are the names of Santa's reindeer?" and be told instantly — or anything else we want to ask. By the way, the wages for librarians went up faster than the wages for other jobs in the U.S. over that same time period, because librarians became partners of computers. Computers became tools, and they got more tools that they could use and become more effective during that time. Same thing happened in offices. Back in the old days, people used spreadsheets. Spreadsheets were spread sheets of paper, and they calculated by hand. But here was an interesting thing that came along. With the revolution around 1980 of P.C.'s, the spreadsheet programs were tuned for office workers, not to replace office workers, but it respected office workers as being capable of being programmers. So office workers became programmers of spreadsheets. It increased their capabilities. They no longer had to do the mundane computations, but they could do something much more. Now today, we're starting to see robots in our lives. On the left there is the PackBot from iRobot. When soldiers came across roadside bombs in Iraq and Afghanistan, instead of putting on a bomb suit and going out and poking with a stick, as they used to do up until about 2002, they now send the robot out. So the robot takes over the dangerous jobs. On the right are some TUGs from a company called Aethon in Pittsburgh. These are in hundreds of hospitals across the U.S. And they take the dirty sheets down to the laundry. They take the dirty dishes back to the kitchen. They bring the medicines up from the pharmacy. And it frees up the nurses and the nurse's aides from doing that mundane work of just mechanically pushing stuff around to spend more time with patients. In fact, robots have become sort of ubiquitous in our lives in many ways. But I think when it comes to factory robots, people are sort of afraid, because factory robots are dangerous to be around. In order to program them, you have to understand six-dimensional vectors and quaternions. And ordinary people can't interact with them. And I think it's the sort of technology that's gone wrong. It's displaced the worker from the technology. And I think we really have to look at technologies that ordinary workers can interact with. And so I want to tell you today about Baxter, which we've been talking about. And Baxter, I see, as a way — a first wave of robot that ordinary people can interact with in an industrial setting. So Baxter is up here. This is Chris Harbert from Rethink Robotics. We've got a conveyor there. And if the lighting isn't too extreme — Ah, ah! There it is. It's picked up the object off the conveyor. It's going to come bring it over here and put it down. And then it'll go back, reach for another object. The interesting thing is Baxter has some basic common sense. By the way, what's going on with the eyes? The eyes are on the screen there. The eyes look ahead where the robot's going to move. So a person that's interacting with the robot understands where it's going to reach and isn't surprised by its motions. Here Chris took the object out of its hand, and Baxter didn't go and try to put it down; it went back and realized it had to get another one. It's got a little bit of basic common sense, goes and picks the objects. And Baxter's safe to interact with. You wouldn't want to do this with a current industrial robot. But with Baxter it doesn't hurt. It feels the force, understands that Chris is there and doesn't push through him and hurt him. But I think the most interesting thing about Baxter is the user interface. And so Chris is going to come and grab the other arm now. And when he grabs an arm, it goes into zero-force gravity-compensated mode and graphics come up on the screen. You can see some icons on the left of the screen there for what was about its right arm. He's going to put something in its hand, he's going to bring it over here, press a button and let go of that thing in the hand. And the robot figures out, ah, he must mean I want to put stuff down. It puts a little icon there. He comes over here, and he gets the fingers to grasp together, and the robot infers, ah, you want an object for me to pick up. That puts the green icon there. He's going to map out an area of where the robot should pick up the object from. It just moves it around, and the robot figures out that was an area search. He didn't have to select that from a menu. And now he's going to go off and train the visual appearance of that object while we continue talking. So as we continue here, I want to tell you about what this is like in factories. These robots we're shipping every day. They go to factories around the country. This is Mildred. Mildred's a factory worker in Connecticut. She's worked on the line for over 20 years. One hour after she saw her first industrial robot, she had programmed it to do some tasks in the factory. She decided she really liked robots. And it was doing the simple repetitive tasks that she had had to do beforehand. Now she's got the robot doing it. When we first went out to talk to people in factories about how we could get robots to interact with them better, one of the questions we asked them was, "Do you want your children to work in a factory?" The universal answer was "No, I want a better job than that for my children." And as a result of that, Mildred is very typical of today's factory workers in the U.S. They're older, and they're getting older and older. There aren't many young people coming into factory work. And as their tasks become more onerous on them, we need to give them tools that they can collaborate with, so that they can be part of the solution, so that they can continue to work and we can continue to produce in the U.S. And so our vision is that Mildred who's the line worker becomes Mildred the robot trainer. She lifts her game, like the office workers of the 1980s lifted their game of what they could do. We're not giving them tools that they have to go and study for years and years in order to use. They're tools that they can just learn how to operate in a few minutes. There's two great forces that are both volitional but inevitable. That's climate change and demographics. Demographics is really going to change our world. This is the percentage of adults who are working age. And it's gone down slightly over the last 40 years. But over the next 40 years, it's going to change dramatically, even in China. The percentage of adults who are working age drops dramatically. And turned up the other way, the people who are retirement age goes up very, very fast, as the baby boomers get to retirement age. That means there will be more people with fewer social security dollars competing for services. But more than that, as we get older we get more frail and we can't do all the tasks we used to do. If we look at the statistics on the ages of caregivers, before our eyes those caregivers are getting older and older. That's happening statistically right now. And as the number of people who are older, above retirement age and getting older, as they increase, there will be less people to take care of them. And I think we're really going to have to have robots to help us. And I don't mean robots in terms of companions. I mean robots doing the things that we normally do for ourselves but get harder as we get older. Getting the groceries in from the car, up the stairs, into the kitchen. Or even, as we get very much older, driving our cars to go visit people. And I think robotics gives people a chance to have dignity as they get older by having control of the robotic solution. So they don't have to rely on people that are getting scarcer to help them. And so I really think that we're going to be spending more time with robots like Baxter and working with robots like Baxter in our daily lives. And that we will — Here, Baxter, it's good. And that we will all come to rely on robots over the next 40 years as part of our everyday lives. Thanks very much. (Applause)

Frequently Occurring Word Combinations

ngrams of length 2

collocation	frequency
mainframe computer	3
office workers	3
retirement age	3
long time	2
ordinary people	2
basic common	2
robot figures	2
working age	2

Important Words

adults
aethon
afghanistan
afraid
age
ages
ah
aides
answer
appearance
applause
area
arm
arthur
artificial
asked
baby
basic
baxter
bit
bomb
bombs
boomers
bring
brought
built
button
calculated
called
capabilities
capable
car
care
caregivers
carry
cars
chance
change
children
china
chris
clarke
climate
collaborate
coming
common
companions
company
competing
computations
computer
computers
connecticut
continue
control
conveyor
country
current
daily
dangerous
day
days
decided
demographics
dignity
dirty
disappear
disappearing
dishes
displaced
dollars
dramatically
driving
drops
effective
ended
engines
everyday
executives
extreme
eyes
fact
factories
factory
famous
fast
faster
fear
feels
fiction
figures
fingers
force
forces
frail
frees
future
game
give
giving
good
grab
grabs
graphics
grasp
great
green
groceries
hand
hands
happened
happening
harbert
harder
hepburn
hospitals
hour
hundreds
hurt
icon
icons
increase
increased
industrial
inevitable
infers
instantly
intelligence
interact
interacting
interesting
interface
internet
iraq
irobot
job
jobs
katharine
kitchen
laundry
learn
leave
left
level
librarians
lifted
lifts
lighting
line
lives
long
longer
losing
lots
mainframe
map
means
mechanically
medicines
menu
mildred
minutes
mode
motions
move
moves
movie
mundane
names
number
nurses
object
objects
office
offices
older
onerous
operate
order
ordinary
overestimate
overestimating
packbot
paper
part
partners
patients
people
percentage
period
person
pharmacy
pick
picked
picks
pittsburgh
play
pockets
poking
press
produce
program
programmed
programmers
programs
push
pushing
put
puts
putting
quaternions
questions
reach
realized
reindeer
rely
repetitive
replace
respected
result
rethink
retirement
revolution
roadside
robot
robotic
robotics
robots
safe
scarcer
scared
science
screen
search
security
select
send
sense
services
setting
sheets
shipping
short
shoulders
simple
slightly
social
society
soldiers
solution
sort
spencer
spend
spending
spread
spreadsheet
spreadsheets
stairs
starting
statistically
statistics
steel
stick
study
stuff
suit
surprised
takes
talk
talking
tasks
technologies
technology
term
terms
time
today
told
tools
totally
tracy
train
trainer
tugs
tuned
turned
typical
ubiquitous
underestimate
underestimated
understand
understands
universal
user
vectors
vision
visit
visual
volitional
wages
wave
ways
web
work
worked
worker
workers
working
world
worried
writer
wrong
years
young